View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently May 14th, 2025, 1:48 am



Reply to topic  [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for? 
Author Message
Firing on 1-2 Spark
User avatar

Joined: November 8th, 2009, 5:42 pm
Posts: 2847
Location: NL
Post Re: Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for?
Sean wrote:
the mapping is on a programmable chip

trigger for the programme is via a hall sensor which will be on the points carrier or a pickup on the flywheel, the power for this pickup comes from the chip and is 5v

no idea if it works all depends what's on the chip, but thats where the 5v comes from.


I just found out the 5 volt output comes frome the 7805 in the schema!!
This feeds the chip/IC and the hall sensor.

When I have some spare time I am going to built one (next year or so) because I like it a lot, it's simple and I believe it works.

_________________
Russell wrote:
Hi Geo,
you've been one of the sites biggest attractions in recent years.
Russ


January 31st, 2011, 12:01 am
Profile WWW
Firing on two.

Joined: July 26th, 2009, 3:36 pm
Posts: 1019
Post Re: Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for?
Blimey, that's certainly interesting!

The bits I think I understand are: the 16F168 is a 'Pic' microchip - ie: one that is essentially 'blank' and has to be programmed to do what you want. It's like a very basic computer RAM chip - basically a memory chip that you can feed lines of instructions into and it will then hold this info and carry out the given task.

The 5Volts comes the rectangular 7805 block in the top right hand corner. That is a little three-wire component which is a voltage regulator. You feed anything from, ooh, 8 to 18 volts (something like that) into it and a steady 5V comes out t'other end. This is needed because the Pic chip needs a regulated 5V to work.

The stuff at the bottom left hand side is - I think - a 'Hall-effect' switch (well, it does have 'HALL' written on it!). A hall-effect switch responds to magnetic pulses, and these are commonly used in contactless ignition systems such as 123 and Lumenition. So, I guess that'll be the sensor and you'd need to fit a suitable magnet (or two?) on the cam.

Finally, there's the big 'Diode Integree' at the top left - that is a 'Power Transistor' of some type. It is there to respond to the output from the Pic chip and then switch the 4 amps or so that the coil needs to function. Chips are delicate beasts with tiny outputs; if you tried to connect it to the coil directly, it would go kaput.

The 'Bobine' is the coil!

So, once built, someone would need to program the Pic chip with instructions on what to do. I guess what you'd want it to do is to respond to varying speeds with different dwell angles and such like. There's a 4-pole switch in the bottom left hand corner - I don't know what these do, but I guess it would 'tweak' the action of the chip to cope with different conditions - perhaps slightly advancing or retarding the ignition or something?

So, it's a completely contactless leccy ignition system probably the equivalent of 123 or Lumen. All it needs is for someone to build it...


(And I see that lpgo is the guy to build it!)


January 31st, 2011, 12:14 am
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: January 26th, 2009, 10:16 pm
Posts: 1074
Location: Derbyshire
Post Re: Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for?
Blimey. I went cross eyed at all that technical stuff. I'm running 123. It's been fine for years, but has done nothing for my fuel economy. Can I tell the difference between 123 and points when driving? No, I can't. But then i can't tell one type of spark plug from another. If it starts, and runs then all is good in my book.

_________________
Image
Mr Early Night aka Snuff Pusher


January 31st, 2011, 12:25 am
Profile
Firing on 1-2 Spark
User avatar

Joined: November 8th, 2009, 5:42 pm
Posts: 2847
Location: NL
Post Re: Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for?
Look at the the website. When you load the .exe file you can make your own ignition curve, dwell and rev-limiter and the you can save it as a .hex file which you can load into the IC using a "IC loading device".

devils advocate I think you know more about it then me (electronics) can you built it first :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Russell wrote:
Hi Geo,
you've been one of the sites biggest attractions in recent years.
Russ


January 31st, 2011, 12:32 am
Profile WWW
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: January 31st, 2010, 10:36 pm
Posts: 313
Location: Norwich
Post Re: Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for?
I think on balance I might go for the 123 jobbie, seems a lot less messing about even if I cant afford it at the moment... better start saving!

_________________
Charlie is gone. Now 2CVless.
Image


January 31st, 2011, 2:05 am
Profile WWW
Agony Aunt - You have a car problem? Speak to Ken

Joined: March 6th, 2009, 1:40 am
Posts: 3675
Post Re: Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for?
Don't forget to store all the 'redundant' parts in the boot.

There's been more than one 2CV driver I've known who regretted not having the fallback option available when 'fit & forget' didn't quite work out as planned... :roll:

ken.


Justint wrote:
I think on balance I might go for the 123 jobbie, seems a lot less messing about even if I cant afford it at the moment... better start saving!

_________________
Image


January 31st, 2011, 2:11 am
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: November 29th, 2008, 10:05 pm
Posts: 9259
Location: West Sussex, U.K.
Post Re: Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for?
Rumble602 wrote:
Blimey. I went cross eyed at all that technical stuff. I'm running 123. It's been fine for years, but has done nothing for my fuel economy. Can I tell the difference between 123 and points when driving? No, I can't. But then i can't tell one type of spark plug from another. If it starts, and runs then all is good in my book.



It's not just me then!

_________________
samfieldhouse wrote:
What I like about I2F is that there is no pretence of democracy.


January 31st, 2011, 8:37 am
Profile
Firing on two.

Joined: April 22nd, 2009, 11:06 pm
Posts: 3684
Location: Ecosse
Post Re: Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for?
:lol:
Ken and I had talked/joked about doing a "blind test" at one of the events, to see if anyone could spot which cars were on points and which were on 123 or the like.

It all comes down to "I want the car to start, but I don't want to invest a bit of time and knuckle skin to do so, so ill deploy the 2"x 3" bit of plastic"

Sean

_________________
Kissing the Lash
Image
"Any advice of a technical nature is given on the understanding that I've actually done this shit, not just read about it in D*lly club mag some time ago.


January 31st, 2011, 10:37 am
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: December 9th, 2008, 7:50 pm
Posts: 662
Post Re: Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for?
Very interesting stuff! I think I know where I'd be able to get my hands on a PIC programmer as well..! Interesting that the older version of the circuit had a capacitor across the transistor, whereas the newer one doesn't seem to. Or is that just due to the different transistor? My French is awful - was there a link on the site to any photos of how they've installed it all?


January 31st, 2011, 10:54 am
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: May 16th, 2010, 5:04 pm
Posts: 835
Post Re: Electronic Ignition.. what type should I go for?
Sean wrote:
:lol:
Ken and I had talked/joked about doing a "blind test" at one of the events, to see if anyone could spot which cars were on points and which were on 123 or the like.

It all comes down to "I want the car to start, but I don't want to invest a bit of time and knuckle skin to do so, so ill deploy the 2"x 3" bit of plastic"

Sean


To be fair though there are sound reasons to ditch the points and go electronic besides laziness,

On a 123 the points box and advance retard springs are removed entirely. The ignition is triggered by 2 magnets placed over the pins for the bob weight springs and the ignition is triggered by a Hall effect sensor.

The advance curve as well as the dwell angle are programmed into the ignition unit and therefore gives far superior control over advance and dwell parameters than you can achieve with mechanical points.


January 31st, 2011, 12:33 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 27 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 337 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.