View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently May 13th, 2025, 1:31 am



Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 lowering 
Author Message
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: January 31st, 2010, 10:36 pm
Posts: 313
Location: Norwich
Post lowering
is it really daft to think of lowering my 2cv? Please tell me i'm being stupid!

_________________
Charlie is gone. Now 2CVless.
Image


August 7th, 2010, 3:33 pm
Profile WWW
Firing on two.

Joined: May 3rd, 2009, 11:40 am
Posts: 816
Location: Melbourne, Australia.
Post Re: lowering
8-)

Harley

_________________
samfieldhouse wrote:
It is M9 for the shocks yes, the rest I'll check when next i'm underneath her. Ironically, this will be valentines day.


August 7th, 2010, 4:38 pm
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: November 29th, 2008, 10:05 pm
Posts: 9259
Location: West Sussex, U.K.
Post Re: lowering
Make sure you do it right with a set of turned arms and harder springs, that's all you need to do.

It's easy, I changed a car from lowered to standard in about 3hrs on friday, that's four new springs, and two front arms. Nothing to it.

_________________
samfieldhouse wrote:
What I like about I2F is that there is no pretence of democracy.


August 7th, 2010, 5:01 pm
Profile
Firing on two.

Joined: February 4th, 2009, 2:52 pm
Posts: 268
Post Re: lowering
'channel' it, that's the only way Belgian racers handle so well, it respects the original design of suspension geometry, see here: http://www.aussiefrogs.com/forum/showthread.php?p=762767nice work!
and herehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chopping_and_channeling


August 7th, 2010, 6:28 pm
Profile WWW
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: January 31st, 2010, 10:36 pm
Posts: 313
Location: Norwich
Post Re: lowering
hummm interesting, thanks.

_________________
Charlie is gone. Now 2CVless.
Image


August 7th, 2010, 7:22 pm
Profile WWW
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: January 5th, 2009, 5:48 am
Posts: 1687
Location: Haven't a clue
Post Re: lowering
How far are you thinking of going? you can lower it an inch or two below standard simply by adjusting the tie rods, no need to replace anything. In my opinion the benefit of less body roll outweighs the downside of sightly heavier steering.

_________________
Image


August 8th, 2010, 12:24 am
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: January 31st, 2010, 10:36 pm
Posts: 313
Location: Norwich
Post Re: lowering
thats not a bad idea, its not as if I need all that suspension travel.

_________________
Charlie is gone. Now 2CVless.
Image


August 8th, 2010, 9:24 am
Profile WWW
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: November 29th, 2008, 10:05 pm
Posts: 9259
Location: West Sussex, U.K.
Post Re: lowering
Any more than that though, and you'll notice the steering become considerably heavier, which is when you need to think about modified front arms. It'll put more strain on your kingpins too, so you'll need to make sure you keep them greased more than you would normally.

_________________
samfieldhouse wrote:
What I like about I2F is that there is no pretence of democracy.


August 8th, 2010, 11:31 am
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: November 29th, 2008, 10:05 pm
Posts: 9259
Location: West Sussex, U.K.
Post Re: lowering
Image

If you're serious about doing it, have a drive of my car at some point (International/Snetterton maybe?). It's on really, really hard springs and will be a lot lower than it is in the last pictures I posted of it, but it'll give you some idea of what the car will be like. Harrys car (the red/yellow Collins plant hire one) is much softer than mine but that's no bad thing as it's far more confortable in use, and it handles really nicely. It depends how far you want to go, an inch or two, as Joolz says, is easy and you don't need to modify anything, but if you want it scraping (I don't see any point in doing it any other way) then you're looking at spending a few quid and changing stuff, and it will affect practicality to a degree.

Of course, you could go the whole hog and channel it, as Roy suggests, but you're looking at doing a lot of work (you basically cut all of the internal structure of the car out and remake it) and it'll be a cock to return to standard again (you'd have to redo all the work you had to do to channel it, and that's potentially a bigger job). This is only worth doing if the sole aim of the car is having the body as low as possible, for purely aesthetic reasons. you're still going to have to do the same work to the suspension as you would simply lowering it.

I'm not sure I like channeled cars, they can look 'wrong', in the same way the average Sidewinder conversion can. A 2cv is a very difficult vehicle to modify the appearance of without making it look strange.

Image

Image

Obviously you won't be looking at the car from this angle, but the absence of anything protruding under the bodywork makes it look a bit odd in my eyes, but from this angle...

Image

Image

...it looks like a normal 2cv, which is nicer to me.

_________________
samfieldhouse wrote:
What I like about I2F is that there is no pretence of democracy.


August 8th, 2010, 6:53 pm
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: January 31st, 2010, 10:36 pm
Posts: 313
Location: Norwich
Post Re: lowering
those look so cool! not sure if I want to go so mad, but they do look good, esp the last one!
there is a 2cv on youtube '2cv injection' which I think is basically a ruined 2cv.
you are right it is the balance between mods and not destroying the classic 2cv look.

_________________
Charlie is gone. Now 2CVless.
Image


August 8th, 2010, 7:09 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 98 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.