9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
Author |
Message |
terpineol
Firing on two.
Joined: May 14th, 2009, 6:31 pm Posts: 210
|
 Re: 9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
terpineol wrote: Acceleration was definitely improved by changing to 9:1, though top speed was reduced for a few weeks before then going back up to about 70. I should add that the 8.5:1 set I removed weren't in the best shape.
|
May 26th, 2010, 5:23 pm |
|
 |
Old-Nail
Firing on two.
Joined: October 7th, 2009, 12:10 pm Posts: 2192 Location: NWUK
|
 Re: 9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
OK 9:1 it is then, I'll try the Dyane box out and see for myself which I think is better. How about the carb' jetting, Can anyone tell me what I need? Is there a 105 main jet? I'm also wondering if it's worth the faff to rig up the forced air contraption?
_________________
 'Democracy my Arse'
|
May 26th, 2010, 5:37 pm |
|
 |
toomany2cvs
Firing on two.
Joined: December 26th, 2008, 9:40 pm Posts: 3332 Location: Surrounded by 2cvs...
|
 Re: 9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
Old-Nail wrote: I'm also wondering if it's worth the faff to rig up the forced air contraption? IME, no. My first 2cv went onto a Dyane chassis after meeting a dry-stone wall at speed - so, of course, I wanted to use the turbo tube... If you use the Dyane setup, the tube is very tight around the upper wing retaining nut, and the air filter tight against the inner wing. Fitting and removing the tube is a bugger, and needs to be removed to get at that nut. Forget changing that plug with the wing on - you can barely see it. So, of course, it ended up being run with the tube off as much as on. No noticeable difference.
_________________
 Zookeeper of a miscellany of motorised silliness - from 0.75bhp to 9ft tall - now living life on the road in an old VW. http://WhereverTheRoadGoes.com
|
May 26th, 2010, 6:17 pm |
|
 |
Russell
Firing on two.
Joined: November 29th, 2008, 10:05 pm Posts: 9259 Location: West Sussex, U.K.
|
 Re: 9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
I agree with Adrian, I've driven dyanes and 2cvs, and Ami8s, I couldn't tell a difference. I'm sure if all engines were constantly kept in optimum condition and every parameter were kept strictly the same, then 9:1 would be a bit quicker. But you're unlikely to notice it. The same for the turbo tube.
_________________
samfieldhouse wrote: What I like about I2F is that there is no pretence of democracy.
|
May 26th, 2010, 6:54 pm |
|
 |
hjbharry
Firing on two.
Joined: May 1st, 2009, 11:36 pm Posts: 856 Location: hertfordshire
|
 Re: 9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
Old-Nail wrote: OK 9:1 it is then, I'll try the Dyane box out and see for myself which I think is better. How about the carb' jetting, Can anyone tell me what I need? Is there a 105 main jet? I'm also wondering if it's worth the faff to rig up the forced air contraption? For my carb jets one of the jets was taken out (main) and simply just drilled the hole bigger (0.7mm drill bit)  (guessing?) I don't think the forced air does much tbh I've got a massive cone type air filter straight on the carb and i think that just makes more induction noise than anything really
_________________
 Low and Loud!
|
May 26th, 2010, 7:15 pm |
|
 |
ken
Agony Aunt - You have a car problem? Speak to Ken
Joined: March 6th, 2009, 1:40 am Posts: 3675
|
 Re: 9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
The table at the top of this page is quite a good summary, bearing in mind that a standard 8.5:1 A series engine should give around 150 psi at cranking speed, compared to 175 psi for a 9.0:1 engine. < http://www.nightrider.com/biketech/hdhe ... ession.htm > Harley engines must have more overlap of their valves, which is why the CR and cranking psi figures for the bikes and our engines are not directly comparable, but I'd agree that 'around' 9.0:1 is a good choice. 'Blown induction' has the advantage of providing cooler air to the engine, by drawing it from the front of the car instead of from under the bonnet, but the increase in power is much less significant than that available from an increase in CR. However, because carburettors are sensitive to air velocity, not pressure, the slight increase in air pressure from blown induction will be enough to weaken the mixture, because the level of fuel in the emulsion tubes is depressed by that increased pressure. So, unless the carb is rejetted to suit, blown induction may well be counter-productive. Probably explains why Adrian noticed little or no difference...  ken.
_________________
|
May 26th, 2010, 7:44 pm |
|
 |
Nelsthebass
Firing on two.
Joined: October 5th, 2009, 8:22 pm Posts: 1415 Location: Stone, Staffs
|
 Re: 9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
Our S plated Dyane was by far the quickest A series I have ever driven - with a 9:1 engine and forced induction it could easily hold 80mph all day on the motorway - A good set of 8.5:1 pots are almost as good as 9:1 and often more easily available and I believe are better suited to low octane fuels. I rebuilt Scoobas 2CV with these and it made a massive difference over the old cylinders and I guess any new barrels and cans will be better than an old worn set of originals - pays your money, takes your choice etc...
_________________ 1987 2CV Special 2014 Suzuki Swift Sport 2015 Lexus NX300h 1966 Ami Break
|
May 27th, 2010, 12:06 am |
|
 |
Sean
Firing on two.
Joined: April 22nd, 2009, 11:06 pm Posts: 3684 Location: Ecosse
|
 Re: 9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
ken wrote: So, unless the carb is rejetted to suit, blown induction may well be counter-productive. Probably explains why Adrian noticed little or no difference...  ken. And after 5 yrs playing race car the blown air is a pig to set up, get better results with normal set up on the race car- on overrun and quick pickup it causes real issues for the carb. Nail the dyane box will make a differance first 3 gears lower so you think its going like a bat out of hell, longer top means you can go faster in top, till you get a head wind or a hill. As said in the other thread a good 8.5:1 will perform almost as well as a 9:1 heavy flywheel is a joy to drive its almost unstallable the engine becomes an inertia unit, spin up the flywheel and drop the clutch and you are propelled forwards like you are on the end of an invisible bungee rope. the trend toward the lighter flywheel is due to racers using them for a faster pick up and throttle response, ok on the track but trundling round in the real world in a relaxed heavy flywheel car is a joy.
_________________ Kissing the Lash
 "Any advice of a technical nature is given on the understanding that I've actually done this shit, not just read about it in D*lly club mag some time ago.
|
May 27th, 2010, 8:18 am |
|
 |
toomany2cvs
Firing on two.
Joined: December 26th, 2008, 9:40 pm Posts: 3332 Location: Surrounded by 2cvs...
|
 Re: 9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
ken wrote: So, unless the carb is rejetted to suit, blown induction may well be counter-productive. Probably explains why Adrian noticed little or no difference...  The carb came from the same Dyane as the engine and the induction setup... It was, literally, just a Dyane with a 2cv shell.
_________________
 Zookeeper of a miscellany of motorised silliness - from 0.75bhp to 9ft tall - now living life on the road in an old VW. http://WhereverTheRoadGoes.com
|
May 27th, 2010, 8:20 am |
|
 |
spanners
|
 Re: 9:1 in a 2cv any benefits?
Sean wrote: the trend toward the lighter flywheel is due to racers using them for a faster pick up and throttle response, ok on the track Indeed, I always advise people against them, mine goes like stink but you don't half miss it when you come to a long hill. That is unless you're already trundling and you want to overtake something fairly slow and you want to overtake, the lightened flywheel can come into its own then. 
|
May 27th, 2010, 8:34 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|