Author |
Message |
studioru
Firing on two.
Joined: February 25th, 2009, 12:26 am Posts: 241
|
 Re: Has anyone replaced their kingpins with ball joints?
Pete (subarupete) has these fitted to his 4x4
_________________

http://www.studioru.co.uk
|
January 2nd, 2010, 8:19 pm |
|
 |
Little Louis
Field Plougher
Joined: February 8th, 2009, 12:07 am Posts: 2357
|
 Re: Has anyone replaced their kingpins with ball joints?
studioru wrote: Pete (subarupete) has these fitted to his 4x4 did he make them or get them from that web site?
|
January 2nd, 2010, 8:32 pm |
|
 |
studioru
Firing on two.
Joined: February 25th, 2009, 12:26 am Posts: 241
|
 Re: Has anyone replaced their kingpins with ball joints?
2cv4x4 wrote: studioru wrote: Pete (subarupete) has these fitted to his 4x4 did he make them or get them from that web site? I think they were from that website
_________________

http://www.studioru.co.uk
|
January 2nd, 2010, 8:46 pm |
|
 |
Paul Narramore
Firing on two.
Joined: November 16th, 2009, 10:14 am Posts: 211 Location: Aylesford, Kent
|
 Re: Has anyone replaced their kingpins with ball joints?
I'm puzzled by Spanners interpretation of that section of the MoT. Since most suspensions are already welded in many cases, I presume he understands that 'additional' welding or use of heat is a failure? But that would outlaw most kit cars. What about Caterhams and their clones with their welded wishbone suspensions? Why am I 'not getting this'?
_________________
|
January 3rd, 2010, 9:57 am |
|
 |
spanners
|
 Re: Has anyone replaced their kingpins with ball joints?
Paul Narramore wrote: I'm puzzled by Spanners interpretation of that section of the MoT. Since most suspensions are already welded in many cases, I presume he understands that 'additional' welding or use of heat is a failure? But that would outlaw most kit cars. What about Caterhams and their clones with their welded wishbone suspensions? Why am I 'not getting this'? Paul, I didn't write the manual, I was just mentioning it as Sam had asked about these arms. Yes, most suspension components are welded in the first place but we look for poor welding or obviously modified components which theses are. I don't know how I would stand if I were to fail one on an MOT but suspect due to the way it's worded in the manual, that I would come out the "winner". That said, I'd rather not find out. If I had a Lomax come in with mud guards welded to the arms and they'd been gas welded and you could see evidence of excessive heat, I'd fail it. It's called covering your arse! 
|
January 3rd, 2010, 10:49 am |
|
 |
Paul Narramore
Firing on two.
Joined: November 16th, 2009, 10:14 am Posts: 211 Location: Aylesford, Kent
|
 Re: Has anyone replaced their kingpins with ball joints?
But then what is 'excessive'? Enough heat to make a proper weld or too much to damage what's being welded. So much in the MoT is down to interpretation - the kingpins for instance - so we tend to take our cars to 'sympathetic' MoT testers, don't we? Time to begin my Sunday morning 'Full English' 
_________________
|
January 3rd, 2010, 11:19 am |
|
 |
spanners
|
 Re: Has anyone replaced their kingpins with ball joints?
The other tester at our place has stated categorically that if he tested my eacer, he'd fail it onthe front arm purely because you can see they've been modified by welding even though they're almost certainly a damn sight stronger than original ones. Luckilly, I do know a "sympathetic" and (in my eyes) sensible tester. I was basically told at VOSA training that there's still no substitute for common sense. I'm sure that'll be beaten out of us soon enough though. 
|
January 3rd, 2010, 11:27 am |
|
 |
Russell
Firing on two.
Joined: November 29th, 2008, 10:05 pm Posts: 9259 Location: West Sussex, U.K.
|
 Re: Has anyone replaced their kingpins with ball joints?
Paul Narramore wrote: But then what is 'excessive'? Enough heat to make a proper weld or too much to damage what's being welded. So much in the MoT is down to interpretation - the kingpins for instance - so we tend to take our cars to 'sympathetic' MoT testers, don't we? Time to begin my Sunday morning 'Full English'  I'd have said if the tester can see evidence of heating or welding repair/modification, then if he choses ge could fail it. Like you said, it's mainly interpretation.
_________________
samfieldhouse wrote: What I like about I2F is that there is no pretence of democracy.
|
January 3rd, 2010, 11:34 am |
|
 |
Sean
Firing on two.
Joined: April 22nd, 2009, 11:06 pm Posts: 3684 Location: Ecosse
|
 Re: Has anyone replaced their kingpins with ball joints?
Spanners, do the suspension arms fall under "steering" or does the "welding heating" apply to suspension components too?
sean
happy new year !
_________________ Kissing the Lash
 "Any advice of a technical nature is given on the understanding that I've actually done this shit, not just read about it in D*lly club mag some time ago.
|
January 3rd, 2010, 12:07 pm |
|
 |
toomany2cvs
Firing on two.
Joined: December 26th, 2008, 9:40 pm Posts: 3332 Location: Surrounded by 2cvs...
|
 Re: Has anyone replaced their kingpins with ball joints?
spanners wrote: The other tester at our place has stated categorically that if he tested my eacer, he'd fail it onthe front arm purely because you can see they've been modified by welding even though they're almost certainly a damn sight stronger than original ones. Especially when a Citroen publication - Ici Commence l'Aventure - actually gives dimensions & guides as to how to reinforce arms by welding them...
_________________
 Zookeeper of a miscellany of motorised silliness - from 0.75bhp to 9ft tall - now living life on the road in an old VW. http://WhereverTheRoadGoes.com
|
January 3rd, 2010, 12:21 pm |
|
|