View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently April 29th, 2024, 8:39 am



Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next
 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied 
Author Message
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: March 10th, 2010, 12:37 am
Posts: 1927
Location: Alone in my polytunnel with my pitiful competition onions
Post Re: 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied
The thing we should all remember is that it's twofiftyAZU's car. If he wants to stick a Rover V8 engine in it and channel the bodywork, that's entirely his decision. The rest of us may not like it, but it ain't up to us. If it was mine, I'd probably try and restore it to original spec, if (Ha!) I had the money. But it's not mine.

_________________
The best things in life aren't things.


May 26th, 2010, 12:41 pm
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: May 16th, 2010, 5:04 pm
Posts: 835
Post Re: 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied
Hi Vincent,

Thank you for that it's good to get your input.



MadeInForest wrote:
Hi,
Peter invite me (by email) to jump into this topic. So I jump ;-)
In 1966, the following models were still made in Forest:

AZA (AZ) : chassis number like 11X xxxx
AZM3 : chassis number like 12x xxxx
AZS (AZL) : chassis number like 13x xxxx
AZAM6 (cent. cl.) : chassis number like 300 xxxx
AZAM6 (norm. cl.) : chassis number like 31x xxxx

AZU : chassis number like 12X xxx
AK350 : chassis number like 20x xxx
AKL : chassis number like 25x xxx

The car was probably made in 1966 and directly used in UK.

Image


May 26th, 2010, 12:42 pm
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: May 16th, 2010, 5:04 pm
Posts: 835
Post Re: 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied
Rhythm Thief wrote:
The thing we should all remember is that it's twofiftyAZU's car. If he wants to stick a Rover V8 engine in it and channel the bodywork, that's entirely his decision. The rest of us may not like it, but it ain't up to us. If it was mine, I'd probably try and restore it to original spec, if (Ha!) I had the money. But it's not mine.


It won't get a Rover V8, but if I could retain the FWD and graft in a Volvo T5R engine........... :lol:

Seriously guys, I haven't decided what to do with it yet. One thing is fairly clear, if it sits outside in the rain for a few more years the question will be moot, all that'll be left will be a seized engine and some glass with Belgian markings that can be put into another car.

For the moment I'm trying to figure out what the hell it is. Did it have the Lucas lights with Rubbolite number plate lights when it was sold in the UK? What are the hoops in the rear wings all about? Which headlights did it wear, I'm told by Nick that they were different from normal but they have been "removed for safe keeping" by someone unknown to Nick at some point. Perhaps someone here knows what they were and where they are?

I do have the skills to rebuild it, but if someone has a burning desire to painstakingly restore it then PM me. No one should be under any illusions about this car. It is seriously rusty, it'll need a chassis, it'll need floors, sills, boot floor, the box section under the rear seat, the reinforcing box section under the windscreen aperture, gutter repairs........


May 26th, 2010, 1:02 pm
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: December 26th, 2008, 9:40 pm
Posts: 3332
Location: Surrounded by 2cvs...
Post Re: 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied
Rhythm Thief wrote:
The thing we should all remember is that it's twofiftyAZU's car. If he wants to stick a Rover V8 engine in it and channel the bodywork, that's entirely his decision. The rest of us may not like it, but it ain't up to us.


"We do not own these cars - we merely hold them in trust for the future."

Discuss...

_________________
Image
Zookeeper of a miscellany of motorised silliness - from 0.75bhp to 9ft tall - now living life on the road in an old VW.
http://WhereverTheRoadGoes.com


May 26th, 2010, 1:05 pm
Profile YIM WWW
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: October 7th, 2009, 12:10 pm
Posts: 2192
Location: NWUK
Post Re: 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied
Would the hoops accommodate some sort of mudflap perhaps?

_________________
Image
'Democracy my Arse'


May 26th, 2010, 1:17 pm
Profile WWW
viking bastard
User avatar

Joined: April 18th, 2009, 11:43 am
Posts: 2424
Location: Meneac, Bretagne France
Post Re: 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied
toomany2cvs wrote:

"We do not own these cars - we merely hold them in trust for the future."

Discuss...



Spelling mistake
''We merely hold them in rust for the future''

_________________
Image


May 26th, 2010, 1:20 pm
Profile WWW
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: March 10th, 2010, 12:37 am
Posts: 1927
Location: Alone in my polytunnel with my pitiful competition onions
Post Re: 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied
toomany2cvs wrote:
Rhythm Thief wrote:
The thing we should all remember is that it's twofiftyAZU's car. If he wants to stick a Rover V8 engine in it and channel the bodywork, that's entirely his decision. The rest of us may not like it, but it ain't up to us.


"We do not own these cars - we merely hold them in trust for the future."

Discuss...



But whether or not that's true - and I don't believe it to be myself, but hey ho - it's still Someone Else's Car. While you and I have every right to keep our own cars in absolutely original condition (and mine certainly isn't :) ), we don't have any right to tell anyone else what to do with theirs. If you want to see this restored to original condition (and I don't actually disagree with you there, although I don't feel particularly strongly about it), the only way to guarantee it is for you to buy it yourself.

_________________
The best things in life aren't things.


May 26th, 2010, 1:24 pm
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: February 11th, 2009, 12:32 am
Posts: 3324
Location: Chichester, West Sussex
Post Re: 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied
Old-Nail wrote:
Owning something rare is such a double edged sword isn't it?

This is why I have a D*lly 8-) Not rare, not historically important - good for what it was designed for: economic, cheap motoring and a lot of fun :)

toomany2cvs wrote:
twofifty AZU wrote:
Or the other school of thought is that you replace it with something of at least equal quality, but strikingly different so the history of the object can be read by those looking at it in the future.


Easily identifiable as replacement, yes - but not markedly changing the design and function.


I completely agree with this. Working in a Museum, this is something we face everyday.

The process of replacing parts of an object with materials of equal (or better) quality, but strikingly different so the history of the object can be read by those in the future is the established and recommended advice from the government's Museums' regulating body.

If this type of object was entered into the Museum we would either preserve it 'as is' or, if we intended to make it usable again, replace damaged/missing parts with new ones and thoroughly document the process in a history file. Any substantial componants that needed replacing (engine, etc..) would be preserved seperately.


May 26th, 2010, 1:24 pm
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: March 10th, 2010, 12:37 am
Posts: 1927
Location: Alone in my polytunnel with my pitiful competition onions
Post Re: 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied
samfieldhouse wrote:
Old-Nail wrote:
Owning something rare is such a double edged sword isn't it?

This is why I have a D*lly 8-) Not rare, not historically important - good for what it was designed for: economic, cheap motoring and a lot of fun :)



It's worth remembering that twofiftyAZU's car was designed for exactly the same things. Even though it is now rare.

_________________
The best things in life aren't things.


May 26th, 2010, 1:29 pm
Profile
Firing on two.
User avatar

Joined: January 1st, 2009, 7:37 pm
Posts: 4696
Location: Disunited Kingdom
Post Re: 1966 RHD belgian built AZL, UK supplied
samfieldhouse wrote:
This is why I have a D*lly 8-) Not rare, not historically important - good for what it was designed for: economic, cheap motoring and a lot of fun :)



Sam, a D*lly is still a 2cv and we are still losing them to the scrapman, so it will become rare,and it will become historically important(as one of the last of the line).

_________________
1988 built (1989 F-registered) Citroën 2CV-Six
2013 (63-Plate) VW Golf SE 1.4TSI BMT DSG7
1932 Morris Minor Open Two-Seater (The £100 car).
Image
Image


May 26th, 2010, 1:48 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 9  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 445 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.